The “Cost Shift:” Public Schools Paying More of the “Normal Cost” of Teacher Pensions
Updated: Oct. 1, 2017
Issue: A proposal discussed by state government for many years would require all school districts outside of the City of Chicago to pay a greater share of the annual cost of pensions for TRS members – a so-called “cost shift.”
In July 2017, the General Assembly enacted a limited cost shift for school districts employing TRS members. Under the law, beginning in the 2017-18 school year, local school districts will pay more of the cost of a member’s pension if that member’s salary is equal to or greater than the governor’s statutory salary of $177,412. The district will be responsible for paying the actuarial cost of the benefits earned on the portion of the member’s salary that exceeds $177,412.
Discussion: Active teachers, school districts and state government split the cost of what is owed each year to retired TRS members, as well as the cost of benefits for future retirees. These contributions are supplemented by TRS investment income. Any cost shift would not affect teacher contributions, but would require school districts to pay a greater share of the pension cost due each year – what is called the “employer’s normal cost.”
School districts assuming a portion or all of the employer’s normal cost of TRS pensions would alleviate the state from paying the amount called for in the “shift.” Under most proposals, the state would still be responsible only for paying down the TRS unfunded liability. Estimates indicate that in fiscal year 2016, annual school district contributions would have risen from a total of $148 million to more than $1.47 billion if the entire employer’s normal cost had been shifted to school districts. The state’s annual contribution would have dropped from $3.99 billion to $2.9 billion.
House Speaker Michael Madigan, D–Chicago, Senate President John Cullerton, D–Chicago, and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel have said they do not believe it is fair that suburban and downstate school districts do not pay more of what is owed in a given year to retired teachers. They note that in the city of Chicago, a larger share of the annual cost of teacher pensions each year is funded by a property tax levy in the city — about 18.6 percent, compared to 2.3 percent in the rest of the state. Under legislation first proposed in the spring of 2012, suburban and downstate school districts would be increasingly responsible, over a number of years, for paying an increased share of the annual costs of TRS pensions and the state would pay less toward these costs. Eventually, school districts would be responsible for paying the entire annual cost of benefits being earned every year.
The legislation enacted in 2017 will have a small effect on the amount of money shifted from state government to local school districts. About 16,000 of the System’s 160,000 active members earn a salary that meets or exceeds $177,412. As a result, the first-year “cost shift” under the new law will total approximately $2.5 million.
Shifting the annual cost of pensions to local governments does nothing to lower the costs of teacher pensions for taxpayers. The proposal is just a transfer of responsibility for pension costs from a larger group of taxpayers to a smaller group of taxpayers. The cost of the pensions remains the same. The shift means that the annual cost of pensions for a particular school district’s teachers would not be spread out statewide among millions of taxpayers, but only spread among thousands of people who live in that school district, much like the way municipalities pay for the pension costs for police and firefighters.